This is in response to the discussion on medical university, integrated medicine etc:
I am attaching a copy of my communication sent to the health minister (html file). I had proposed that allopathy, ayurveda, homeo, and other health care units of a panchayat should be encouraged to operate under the same roof and share certain basic facilities in order to provide the best of healthcare at minimal costs. The write up is self explainatory and I had sent it to the minister in June last year as email and deivered a copy to her PS when I called on her office in July/August. Minister was on tour and I could not meet her. I am submitting the proposal in the context of the current discussion on the subject. In case anybody has difficulty in file handling, I will send the document separately.
K Vijayachandran
22.04.2007
P S Rajasekharan <psrajasekharan_at_gmail.com> wrote: The full text of the report is available on the site www.kerala.gov.in or www.prd.kerala.gov.in
P S Rajasekharan
On 4/21/07, M G P Panickar <mgppanickar_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Dr Iqbal committe has already submitted its report to the
minister.Eventhogh the full content is not available ,the indications
availabale from the media that the proposed medicakl varsity is
entirely for the Alopathy medical instistutions in Kerala .Is it
correct? It is a just thought that all the medical education including
the Indian System of medicines are also be included in the proposed
univesity.Equal impotance should be given to all branches of medical
sciences.I think KSSP will not have a bias towards the Alopathic
medicine.THe term modern medicine is also confusing .This term is now
used for referring the alopathic system alone.I think the main driving
force behind the modern medine is the wide spread use of science anf
techonology for diagnostic purposes which can not be taken as granted
as the preprietory right or achievement of Alopathy.The Indian system
of medicine including Ayurveda can also use these technological
advancement for diagonostic puposes.There shoukd be mind change
towards this.So all the medical inststution in Kerala shoild bring
under the proposed medical university.Am I right?.It is the need of
the hour to think of a integrated medical sytem incorporating all good
aspects of all the branches of medicines ie that there should be
SECULAR system of medine.....Dont think that I am an anti Alopathy
man..Scientific thinking can accomodate all the branches of
medicines....
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Friends of KSSP" group.
To post to this group, send email to ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ksspexchange-unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ksspexchange?hl=ml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
2nd
July 2006
Comrade
PK Sreemathi Teacher,
Government
of Kerala
Thiruvananthapuram
Email:
minister-health@kerala.gov.in
Dear
Comrade Minister,
You
have announced establishing a few model hospitals, maybe Primary Health Centers
or Community Health Centers or both: You have not mentioned either, whether
these will be Allopathic, Ayurvedic or Homeo institutions. Nevertheless, I wish
to share a few thoughts with you in this regard.
1.
At the outset let me quote some bare statistics (Year 2002) on government
healthcare institutions in Kerala, from the Economic Review-2003 of State
Planning Board:
Item |
Total Numbers
|
Allopathic % |
Ayurveda % |
Homeo % |
|
Institutions |
2712 |
48 |
31 |
21 |
|
Beds |
50805 |
91 |
7 |
2 |
|
Inpatients |
1935696 |
95 |
4 |
1 |
|
Outpatients |
80940260 |
48 |
22 |
30 |
2.
At the primary level, there were 933 allopathic, 842 Ayurvedic and 555 Homeo institutions
(2330 in all) and they were mostly dispensaries with very minimal or no
inpatient facilities. They are Panchayat or municipal-ward level institutions, with
less than five beds on the average, and mostly taking care of outpatients. In
2002, there were about 810 lakh outpatients treated by these institutions; 22%
in Ayurveda, 30 % in Homeo and 48 % in Allopothic institutions.
3. Such
a delivery profile of public healthcare systems is a unique experience at the
national as well as global level. The situation therefore demands a unique treatment
as well, for making optimum use of the resources at our command. These centers
are located in different places and administered from the top, by various
departments sitting in watertight compartments. It will make immense sense if
these grass root level institutions are located in the same compound,
preferably under the same roof, as Integrated
Primary Health Centers (IPHC).
4. IPHC have several obvious advantages such
as:
a)
A
common integrated health center, functioning as a 7X24 emergency facility in
the village/municipal ward, will be easily accessible by all local citizens.
b)
Patients
can choose the treatment, Allopathic, Ayurvedic or Homeo and buy different
medicines after reaching the IPHC.
c)
There could be a common registration center
for keeping the patients case sheets and maintaining the medical history cards
of all local citizens.
d)
IPHCs
can substantially improve the quality of health statistics and provide better
tools for healthcare planning: Registration with the local IPHC can be made
obligatory.
e)
Private
practitioners of different disciplines in a locality may register with the IHPC
and their services could be pooled with through appropriate Government schemes.
f)
Facilities
maintained by IPHC, such as laboratory, X-ray and other diagnostic equipment
and even bed-care could be shared by different disciplines.
g)
Doctors
of different disciplines could easily consult with each other, and provide the
best of service to the patients: Best of services could be mobilized in
community medicine and in the control of epidemics.
h)
Close
interaction of medical practitioners of diverse disciplines, at the grass root
level, will lead to big improvements in the quality of outpatient care, which in
turn will substantially bring down the demand for inpatient care.
i)
Experience
gained through such grass-root level cooperation between diverse disciplines
could be taken to the higher levels of healthcare viz community health centers,
district hospitals and even specialty hospitals.
j)
Widespread
practice of alternative medicine in Kerala, especially Ayurveda has attracted
worldwide attention and even international agencies like the WHO will be interested
in the IPHC innovations.
k)
Tourism
is hijacking Ayurveda in an unhealthy manner and upholding the medical
relevance of Ayurveda can check this trend: Panchakarma therapy could compete
even with acupuncture in the international market for alternative medicines.
l)
IPHCs
will ensure a minimum level of prenatal, postnatal and geriatric care, the principal
concerns of the people, at a cost affordable by public exchequer.
4..
Primary Health Centers are already declared as the responsibility of Panchayats,
who could be easily encouraged to bring Allopothic, Ayurvedic and Homeo units
of their locality under the same roof, and to organize common infrastructure facilities.
There is no need for any administrative compulsion: Changed work environment
will encourage doctors and paramedical staff of diverse disciplines to discover
ways and means of cooperation, in the best interest of their patients. Such
methods of working together by different disciplines are successfully practiced
in China, right from the early days of the revolution, under advice from
Chairman Mao. In independent India too, there were moves at the higher levels for
developing an Integrated System of Medicine: This could not take off due to
lack of support and participation from grass root level. Healthcare statistics
of Kerala quoted in the first paragraph show the feasibility as well as the
desirability of building up an integrated health system in Kerala from grass-root
level, from the village panchayats and municipal-wards upwards.
5.
I may conclude this note with a request that, Comrade Minister for Health may
setup a small task force to draw up a detailed scheme for the purpose, and
identify ten panchayats/municipal divisions in each district, where IPHCs maybe
as prototype models, to start with. These may be largely self-financing schemes
with need-based financial or other inputs from Government. Detailed planning
maybe left to the concerned Panchayats or municipal-wards with a minimum of
guidelines as necessary.
6.
I would very much like to meet you and explain the idea in more detail if
necessary, as and when I come to Thiruvananthapuram next time. I will be only
glad to send you more of explanatory notes, in the meanwhile, if you so desire.
I
am copying this mail to the Chief Minister, the Minister for Panchayts as well
as the Vice Chairman of State Planning Board and to a few other members of the
public who are even more competent to debate on the subject.
With
warm greetings from Kochi,
Yours
fraternally,
K
Vijayachandran
Chairman,
Cochin Center for Policy Initiative.
35/194
Automobile Road, Palarivattom
Kochi
682025: Phone-0484-2344015
END
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : เดคเดฟ เดเตเดฒเต 09 2007 - 20:45:50 IST