[കേ.ശാ.സാ

From: <doxa_at_sancharnet.in>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:52:33 +0530 (GMT+05:30)

 =?UTF-8?Q?.=E0=B4=AA]_?==?646?Q?Re__[=3F=3F.=3F=3F.=3F=3F.=3F]_Re:_[=
 E0=B4=3F=E0=B5=3F.=E0?=
 =?646?Q?=B4=B6=E0=B4=BE.=E0=B4=B8=E0=B4=BE.=E0=B4=AA]_Re:FS_Service?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_164_33522126.1178166153511"
X-Originating-IP: 220.227.128.111
Message-ID: <27461553.1178166153512.JavaMail.nobody_at_ndl1pp2-a-fixed>
X-SAVSE-SAFESTAMP: Scanned through BSNL Anti-Virus
Reply-To: ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
Sender: ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Google-Loop: groups
Mailing-List: list ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com;
        contact ksspexchange-owner_at_googlegroups.com
List-Id: <ksspexchange.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ksspexchange-help_at_googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/ksspexchange/subscribe>,
        <mailto:ksspexchange-unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com>

------=_Part_164_33522126.1178166153511
Content-Type: text/plain

Joseph,
I think after we combine our reading of the situation with some classic interpretation of the environment that uses/promotes non-free software through the words of RMS, the contrast will get evident.

RMS, for instance, says that existence of non-free software itself is highly depended on a society that remains *divided* (as individuals). Its promotion definitely rests on this divisive-ness, ie, the more you involve yourself in non-free software, the more you are involved in dividing a community (preventing emergence of its *ideal*). That should be our *principal enemy no 1*.

One cannot have a community-oriented approach in such a divided society. Its a paradoxical situation. And conversely, promotion of non-free software is also not possible in a (free-software oriented) community. To me, this is the *reference point* of a framework from where an individual starts interacting with a community in which she is a constituent.

Our policy supports an *ideal reference point*, but this project of *Smart City* acts as a virus - it corrupts, distorts and reproduces the unwanted tendencies we are trying to prevent - the consequences are definitely not desirable. I this the present dispensation of people associated with IT ministry is very rare (to the best of my knowledge - I'm sincerely saying this)- we need to make the best out of it.

Lets continue with our discussion.
CK Raju

--------Original Message -------
Yes this is the situation and I agree with RVG. Teaching IT from UKG etc and the talk on computer literacy etc look more like comic
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Friends of KSSP" group.
To post to this group, send email to ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ksspexchange-unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ksspexchange?hl=ml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

------=_Part_164_33522126.1178166153511--
Received on വ്യാ മെ 03 2007 - 17:55:51 IST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : തി ജൂലൈ 09 2007 - 20:45:50 IST