[കേ.ശാ.സാ.പ] Re: [കേ.ശാ.സാ

raju,.
an average keralite has his own expectations. he dont want to be a "thadi,
beedi, buji". he welcomes smart city for he see a good future in it. he
has seen, with in every 5 years, our rulers visit foreign contries for
inviting investment. the 'smart cityens' surely have their own interests.
that is why they came. it is v who have to uplift our interest. if any thing
wrong with the investment of smart city, pl point out what it is and what is
the alternative. if u ever have visited a foreign country, seen malayalees
struggling for living, u would not have said like this. . pl dont be a
'pinthiripan'. pl let the next generation of poor malayalees to live.

andrews mathew

On 5/3/07, deepak p <deepakp7_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Raju,
> i dont get ur argument, although u use words like "violent desighn" and
> "virus", u dont seem to justify it.
> lemme ask you,
> 1. What are the effects of "Smart City" which are undesirable?
> 2. What is the alternative model (that guarantees earning of money) to the
> Smart City?
>
> Deepak
>
>
> On 5/3/07, Arun Sreekumar <arunsree_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting CK Raju,
> >
> > "One cannot have a community-oriented approach in such a divided
> > society"
> >
> > I agree with the basic vision Raju put forward - our primary goal is a
> > society which has no divisions.
> >
> > Regards
> > Arun
> >
> > On 5/2/07, doxa_at_sancharnet.in < doxa_at_sancharnet.in> wrote:
> > >
> > > Joseph,
> > > I think after we combine our reading of the situation with some
> > > classic interpretation of the environment that uses/promotes non-free
> > > software through the words of RMS, the contrast will get evident.
> > >
> > > RMS, for instance, says that existence of non-free software itself is
> > > highly depended on a society that remains *divided* (as individuals). Its
> > > promotion definitely rests on this divisive-ness, ie, the more you involve
> > > yourself in non-free software, the more you are involved in dividing a
> > > community (preventing emergence of its *ideal*). That should be our
> > > *principal enemy no 1*.
> > >
> > > One cannot have a community-oriented approach in such a divided
> > > society. Its a paradoxical situation. And conversely, promotion of non-free
> > > software is also not possible in a (free-software oriented) community. To
> > > me, this is the *reference point* of a framework from where an individual
> > > starts interacting with a community in which she is a constituent.
> > >
> > > Our policy supports an *ideal reference point*, but this project of
> > > *Smart City* acts as a virus - it corrupts, distorts and reproduces the
> > > unwanted tendencies we are trying to prevent - the consequences are
> > > definitely not desirable. I this the present dispensation of people
> > > associated with IT ministry is very rare (to the best of my knowledge - I'm
> > > sincerely saying this)- we need to make the best out of it.
> > >
> > > Lets continue with our discussion.
> > > CK Raju
> > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Friends of KSSP" group.
To post to this group, send email to ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ksspexchange-unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ksspexchange?hl=ml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on വ�യാ മെ 03 2007 - 22:46:01 IST