[കേ.ശാ.സാ.പ] Re: Re [??.??.??.?] Re: Re [??.??.??.?] Re: 13th May 07: Discussion on Smartcity & Changing Kerala Society

Of course no.

I meant who employes is more important than what contribution they give to
the society that builds us. There need to be a level ground where even
coroprates need to accept a social responsibility which they are not
willingly doing in India- be it Coke factory or Wipro. There was also a Tata
who gave us IISc. Not all need be so greatky chritable but they need to keep
in phase with the social concerns. If Govt. itself fails it, they are going
into an unholy nexus with corporates.

On 5/11/07, deepak p <deepakp7_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I dont really understand the argument about the "Government Nexus with the
> Corporate World".. Is it that no government should invite investment from a
> private party? Is your argument that the Government should be the sole
> employer? I dont see how that model can succeed, esp. from this scenario
>
> On 5/11/07, Ayyappadas A. M. <ayyappadas.am_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just took up the issue Arun had raised for I deemed it relavent from
> > the social perspective and to the topic of discussion.
> >
> > Now coming to your argument of Govt.'s nexus with corporate world, let
> > me clarify that I am a stringent opposer of such unholy nexus which
> > ultimately goes against people. Also, I'm a GNU. So there is no doubt for
> > me regarding the question which is the best model for society - GNU or
> > properietory.
> >
> > Legistlation has a huge part in social transformation. But will it occur
> > with mere legislation is the question. Is it because that we lack proper
> > legislation that attrocities against adivasis, women or children are still
> > perpectuated. There comes the role of citizenary. Citizenary need to play a
> > proactive role to retain democrazy or else our state will go to dogs.
> >
> > Ayyappadas
> > On 5/11/07, doxa_at_sancharnet.in <doxa_at_sancharnet.in> wrote:
> > >
> > > --------Original Message -------
> > > there need be equal avenues in every project which is not the sole
> > > responsibility of Govt. but citizenary. So this question need to be
> > >
> > > That would be to undermine the effect of legislation on a common
> > > erring citizen. Legal framework is also a way which mediates a citizen as he
> > > gets integrated into a society. There could also be a check on the *forced
> > > unsolicited* advertisement hoardings that sprune up in every nook and corner
> > > - is violence non-related to such *off-beat* messages. Do we see them in
> > > areas where these are not there - at the same level.
> > >
> > > Coming to rhetorics and alternatives - violence needs to be exposed,
> > > suggesting alternate violence cannot be my concern. There are other ways by
> > > which an individual can perceive information technology and get integrated
> > > into a collective where antagonisms could get resolved as and when they are
> > > exposed. Here, the State is preventing its emergence, by getting into a
> > > nexus with corporate world. Worse, its celebrating this nexus. The State is
> > > forcing a one-dimensional way of looking at information technology - it
> > > appears to be putting its citizens in great distress. That is violence.
> > >
> > > CK Raju
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > http://deepakp7.googlepages.com/
> > > >
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Friends of KSSP" group.
To post to this group, send email to ksspexchange_at_googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ksspexchange-unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ksspexchange?hl=ml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on വെ മെ 11 2007 - 15:54:05 IST